tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11068216.post7825271888686525341..comments2023-11-03T00:46:46.649-07:00Comments on Electric City Weblog: Voting on PowerGeeGuyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13896054313394692210noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11068216.post-544121045423189682007-08-17T15:29:00.000-07:002007-08-17T15:29:00.000-07:00Anon 9:08 & GeeGuyNot to be daft but I am trying t...Anon 9:08 & GeeGuy<BR/><BR/>Not to be daft but I am trying to find info on the city web page. <BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.ci.great-falls.mt.us/records/minutes/yr2003/090203_09.pdf" REL="nofollow">The draft ordinance is attached along with an Attorney General’s Opinion which affirms the City’s authority to establish an electric utility.</A><BR/><BR/>Working off the 2001 time frame when Tim Gregori wanted to be on the commission - is it beneficial to trace back to the original thoughts on city owned power plants began being discussed? Maybe things can better be linked to why the public right to vote was revoked.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.ci.great-falls.mt.us/records/wsminutes/yr2001/ws07172001.htm" REL="nofollow">From JOURNAL OF COMMISSION WORK SESSIONS<BR/>JULY 17, 2001:</A>Energy Costs are a significant uncertainty for future budgets. Our electric contract will sustain us through June 30, 2002, but we will be at the mercy of the open market thereafter.<BR/><BR/>Still searchingAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11068216.post-45752776865849516082007-08-16T13:43:00.000-07:002007-08-16T13:43:00.000-07:00Please provide a link to the attorney's opinion. ...Please provide a link to the attorney's opinion. I hope you do not refer to the AG opinion, because the one that I have seen is inapplicable on its face.<BR/><BR/>More info please.GeeGuyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13896054313394692210noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11068216.post-68565128085012922552007-08-16T09:08:00.000-07:002007-08-16T09:08:00.000-07:00Still LazyYou must look at the Atty Oppinion that ...Still Lazy<BR/>You must look at the Atty Oppinion that was profered to enact 2861, and it is an Ord. not Res.<BR/>Before any money is spent(not GO's) there will be a vote of the electors.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com