One Down
Well, the second case settled. So, I will have a summer in a week or so!
Next week's trial is still a go, though, and unless there is major movement from the other side (which is very unlikely) it will be tried.
It is a plaintiff's case which is somewhat unusual for me since I do mostly defense work. I have learned that there is a reason why I never criticized the 1/3 contingent fee arrangements. Preparing a plaintiff's case for trial is incredibly difficult, on the whole much more difficult than a defense case.
Most people who slam the plaintiffs' contingent fee arrangement, or the cost of trial lawyers in general, have no conception of what it takes to try a case. That does not mean that there should be no limit on fees in relationship to the effort and risk, but I would prefer it if the attorneys would simply choose to limit their fees in some cases rather than risk regulation from disgruntled client groups or organizations opposed to trial lawyers. I'll try and write more about this later from an 'insider's' perspective.
Right now I can't say much, however, because I do not want to risk that a reader is a potential juror in my case!
1 comment:
Not a potential juror, since I am out of your jurisdiction, and my profession means that I will never be allowed to sit on a jury.
Just out of curiosity, it has been my experience that civil lawyers can be the most uncivil people I have ever met.
I would really like to see another way to compensate attorneys than the 1/3 plus costs that are usually associated with these cases.
I think that I remember reading that a lot of PI cases get solved right before Chritmas. Charitable spirit on the behalf of defense attorneys, or need for cash by the Plaintiff?
Tough call.
Post a Comment