Random Thoughts from the Left on the London Attacks

First, my favorite:

Do you deny then, that Bush is evil?

Calling him evil is just stating a fact. He is no more or no less evil than OBL or Saddam. Evil is evil.

Bush is responsible, if only indirectly, for the terrorist attacks that have occurred today, as they are a direct result of his failing foreign policies. Policies put into place to rape the United States government and is not only costing us billions upon billions of dollars of tax payer money (most of which goes to his criminal buddies), but also in thousands of American lives. That does not even go to mention the countless number of innocent Iraqi's who have been killed.

If that isn't evil, then I don't know what evil is, calling him evil is a simple statement of fact.

Or this one: "Those", "responsible" who "have no respect for human life..." are Bush and Blair etc.! And this will continue until we change our politics.

You have to love this one, implying Bush actually coordinated the attacks in order to take the heat off of himself for the Plame fiasco: "BushCo pulled it off. We have thought he would need to do something but knew he couldn't do it here. How long have we waited for the next strike as his failures and crimes stacked up."

How about this from the Guardian: "Respected MP George Galloway says: "We argued, as did the security services in this country, that the attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq would increase the threat of terrorist attack in Britain. Tragically Londoners have now paid the price of the Government ignoring such warnings."

In other words, for those of you not as smart as liberals, psychotic jihadis bombing unsuspecting innocent civilians never happened before George Bush was elected, and it is only because of Bush's policies that these attacks happen.

You have to wonder how it is that a majority of American people feel they cannot trust the left with their security. Or perhaps not.